7 Best Make.com Alternatives in 2026
Make.com (formerly Integromat) is the visual automation platform — drag boxes, connect them with lines, build multi-step workflows across 3,000+ apps. Generous free tier and stronger logic primitives than Zapier (real branching, error handling, iterators). The friction: visual scenarios get unwieldy past a dozen steps, debugging is painful, and “AI” inside Make still means calling OpenAI as one module rather than agentic behavior. Here are seven alternatives.
1. Carly
Carly is an AI agent platform you email like a colleague. Give each agent its own name and email address, describe what you want, and she figures out which integrations to use across 200+ tools — Gmail, Outlook, the full Microsoft 365 stack, plus CRMs, calendars, file storage, project management, and more.
What makes it different from Make.com: Make is deterministic (you wire the path in a visual builder). Carly is agentic (you email the agent and she picks the path). Make is better for repeatable, exact pipelines. Carly is better for the messy work that resists being mapped to a flowchart.
Best for: Founders and operators who’d rather describe outcomes than draw scenarios.
Pricing: $35/month
2. Zapier
The original no-code automation platform — simpler than Make, with the largest integration library (7,000+) and now AI features (Zapier Agents, AI by Zapier).
What makes it different from Make.com: Zapier is simpler and broader. Make is more powerful for complex logic but harder to learn. Pick Zapier for breadth, Make for depth.
Best for: Non-technical users who want the broadest integration coverage.
Pricing: Free tier; paid from $19.99/month
3. n8n
Fair-code workflow automation — self-hostable, code-friendly, and with a growing AI-agent node library. Free if you self-host.
What makes it different from Make.com: n8n is the source-available spirit-mate. You can run it on your own infrastructure, modify nodes, and avoid per-operation pricing. Steeper setup; lower long-term cost.
Best for: Engineering teams that want control over hosting, data, and cost.
Pricing: Free (self-host); cloud from $24/month
4. Pipedream
Code-first automation — you write JavaScript or Python inside steps, with 3,000+ integrations and a generous free tier.
What makes it different from Make.com: Pipedream rewards code. Make rewards visual thinking. Pipedream is faster once you’re writing the snippets you actually need.
Best for: Developers who want automation but prefer typing code to dragging boxes.
Pricing: Free tier; paid from $19/month
5. Bardeen
Browser-based automation that runs on the page you’re looking at — scrapes, drafts, fills forms, and chains AI steps. Strong “playbook” library for repetitive web work.
What makes it different from Make.com: Bardeen runs in your browser, where most knowledge work happens. Make runs in the cloud, talking to APIs. Different shapes of automation.
Best for: Knowledge workers who repeat the same browser tasks all day.
Pricing: Free tier; paid from $99/month
6. Gumloop
AI-first workflow builder — every node is an AI call, with strong document parsing, scraping, and LLM orchestration primitives.
What makes it different from Make.com: Gumloop assumes AI is the point; Make treats AI as one of many modules. Gumloop is better for “summarize/extract/draft” pipelines.
Best for: Teams building AI-heavy workflows (research, content, document processing).
Pricing: Free tier; paid from $37/month
7. Workato
Enterprise integration platform — much heavier than Make, with governance, RBAC, and the depth required for enterprise IT.
What makes it different from Make.com: Workato is the grown-up version. Built for IT and ops teams managing hundreds of integrations across the org. Pricier and slower to start.
Best for: Enterprise teams that have outgrown Make/Zapier.
Pricing: Custom
Make.com Alternatives Compared
| Tool | Visual Builder | Code | Self-Host | AI-Native | Free Tier | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carly | No (chat) | No | No | Yes | No | $35/mo |
| Zapier | Yes | Light | No | Light | Yes | Free / $19.99/mo |
| n8n | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (self-host) | Free / $24/mo |
| Pipedream | Light | Yes | No | Light | Yes | Free / $19/mo |
| Bardeen | Yes | Light | No | Yes | Yes | Free / $99/mo |
| Gumloop | Yes | Light | No | Yes | Yes | Free / $37/mo |
| Workato | Yes | Yes | Yes (private) | Yes | No | Custom |
FAQ
Is n8n really free if I self-host? Yes — n8n uses a fair-code Sustainable Use License that’s free to self-host for internal business use. Pay for hosting infrastructure, not the software. Best fit for engineering teams.
What’s the AI-native alternative to Make? Carly for chat-based agents, Gumloop for AI-heavy visual workflows, n8n for self-hosted AI agents.
Can I switch from Make to Zapier? Most workflows port directly. Zapier is simpler — you may collapse multi-step Make scenarios into shorter Zaps.
More: Best AI workflow automation tools · Zapier alternatives · n8n alternatives · How to automate work with AI agents
Ready to automate your busywork?
Carly schedules, researches, and briefs you—so you can focus on what matters.
Get Carly Today →Or try our Free Group Scheduling Tool or Free Booking Page
